Packers vs. Vikings- Part 1
Packers vs. Vikings- Part 1WEAU Blog Listing
Packers vs. Vikings- Part 1
Topic Author: Bob Gallaher
Posted: 4:48 PM Oct 2, 2009
Replies Posted: 1 comments
Save Email Print
Recent Blog Topics

Font Size:

It's Friday afternoon and I'm busy preparing for another hectic evening of high school football, and trying to recover from my disappointment of my hometown of Chicago NOT getting the 2016 Summer Olympic Games.  I'm a Chicagoan so I'm used to losing, so after a few moments of sulking I have decided to get on with my life.   What is of more pressing concern for sports fans here in Eau Claire is Monday's Packers-Vikings game at the Metrodome.  Green Bay faces former quarterback Brett Favre for the first time.  I have vascillated back and forth on which team I think will win, and right now I'm picking a Packers upset, 37-34 in overtime.  I believe Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers will turn the ball over several times combined with teach qb throwing a pick-six interception.  The reason I believe Minnesota will lose is head coach Brad Childress.  If he puts this game in the hands of any other player than Adrian Peterson, he is a fool!  If Brett Favre is asked to throw the ball more than 30 times Monday night, the Vikings will lose!  I think the Packers offensive line will have a rough time with the Vikings front four and if they do not block better than they did the first three weeks of the season, Rodgers will be running for his life, and may get hurt.  Still, I don't see another miraculous Brett Favre final seconds win, I predict a Favre turnover in overtime that leads to a Mason Crosby game-winning field goal, redemption from last year.

Your thoughts?

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.

The comment sections of our web site are designed for thoughtful, intelligent conversation and debate. We want to hear from our viewers but we are not obligated to post all comments. We especially will not post those we feel inappropriate or violate our guidelines. However, our interpretation of what is considered proper and what is not, can often be different than those posting to the site. Here are some but not all of the criteria we use when posting comments:

  • Comments cannot be profane or vulgar. Children and families visit this site all the time. We will not post comments that use profanity or cross the lines of good taste.
  • We will not post comments that use hate speech. Slurs, stereotypes and violent talk aren’t welcome on our web site.
  • Comments should not attack other readers or people featured in our stories personally. Any accusations should be backed up with facts. For example we will not post a comment accusing someone of being a drug dealer or child molester if they have not been charged with that crime. We will, at our discretion, allow more broad based postings. For instance, heated political points of view might be allowed if it’s directed at an entire party or a public figure. If directed toward a private individual or commenter, we likely won’t post.
  • We don’t post comments that indulge in just plain bad behavior. We are not obligated to post comments that are just plain rude or insensitive. We reserve the right to determine what is considered rude and insensitive and what is not.
  • Any comment we post will be posted in its entirety. We do not edit any comment that we post.

As a host WEAU 13 News welcomes a wide spectrum of opinions. However this is a site that we host. We have a responsibility to all our readers to try to keep our comment section fair and decent. For that reason WEAU 13 News reserves the right to not post or to remove any comment.

Read Comments
  • by Tom Location: Fall Creek on Oct 10, 2009 at 10:37 PM
    Where's part 2? BTW, I'm surprised you didn't mention the matchup between a very good MN d-line, and GB's pourous o-line. Obviously, that was the difference. Maybe we could have mentioned that, or more in-depth analysis instead of Olympic coverage that doesn't affect Western WI.
1 - 15 - 1 - 0